Lately I've been thinking a lot about the following exercise. I'm going to try it right now:
Take 10 minutes, and write down anything you've ever been really fascinated by (something you've had the urge to tell someone else about)
it's 1:23
the Gauss-Bonnet theorem, Visual Complex Analysis, Taylor series, personal autonomy, Burning Man, free education, Seymour Papert's Mindstorms, the fundamental group, PJ Harvey, computational biology, cell biology, algorithms, differential geometry, James Joyce, hands-on science, hands-on science education, childhood development, class structure, Marx's theory of communism, chess, chess as a way to understand one's own learning, meditation, Zen Buddhism, John Holt, Jonathan Kozol, laser cutters, breadboarding, welding, soldering, algebraic topology, Camp Kaleidoscope, Goedel Escher Bach, taking machines apart, the German language, learning foreign languages without classes, the twin primes conjecture, divisionplot.com or divisorplot.com, Benham's disks, microwaving CDs or LEDs or steel wool or fire, mathematics education, early arithmetic development, Paul Farmer and Mountain Beyond Mountains, Thomas Pynchon, transistors, logic, the role of math in society, the role of research-level math in society, developing intuition, video games, giant public art, how to help people feel calm and free, love, my family and the people in it, copyright law, holistic vision therapy, capoeira.
done!
I think I could keep going with that. That leans really heavily on the intellectual and mathematical -- probably because ideas are easy to recall being engrossed in than experiences are. I'm really curious as to what kind of cluster or visual representation I could construct that shows all of the things I've ever been *really* into. I think the interesting thing about this now is that while most of these things aren't things I'm engaging with right now (and many of those were just day-long infatuations), I think they're all the sorts of things that when mentioned to me now, I perk up a little bit more than normal and pay extra attention to There's still a soft spot in me for all of them. It's sort of an intellectual history -- the ideas that I've been passionate about that take me to where I am currently.
I've been curious about what questions you can ask people to make them more aware of their own intellectual identities. I see the "3 skills" question as scratching the surface, with a forward-thinking point of view: what are your current intellectual goals, and now that you can see a piece of them, does that make you think about what you're doing now any differently? I wonder how being aware of the ideas one has been in love can help one understand one's intellectual goals, dreams, and desires in the present moment.
Sunday, June 29, 2008
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
16 comments:
It would be cool to make an app for this like the one for music which I can't find the really pretty one right now but is functionally equivalent to music-map.com
I also suspect that your list would be noticeably changed if you started from a different first item. This might be an interesting exercise to do weekly and track the changes, or something.
That's a good point! I am sure that where I started or what I was thinking about was hugely influential (the last thing I can recall thinking about before starting this was trying to play with was the Navier-Stokes equations.)
While writing down that list, I felt like there's a whole lot I'm missing, and yet while writing struggled to think of more. I'll try this in a week from now and see what happens.
viagra for cheap viagra for cheap what is generic viagra marijuana and viagra buy online viagra where to buy viagra viagra free trial is viagra safe for women no prescription viagra viagra doseage viagra equivalent viagra from india buy online viagra how long does viagra last
naglenaglenagle.blogspot.com is very informative. The article is very professionally written. I enjoy reading naglenaglenagle.blogspot.com every day.
bad credit payday loans
online payday loans canada
Well done is sick than well said.
Artistically done is richer reconsider than well said.
Splendidly done is sick than well said.
A human beings who dares to waste everyone hour of time has not discovered the value of life.
[url=http://www.orthodoxdetroit.com/apps/profile/profilePage?id=54280822]Linsey[/url]
Linsey
A humankind who dares to barrens bromide hour of age has not discovered the value of life.
[url=http://www.glasgowstudent.net/forum/profile.php?section=personality&id=12390]Jenna[/url]
Gilda
We should be painstaking and discriminating in all the advice we give. We should be extraordinarily prudent in giving information that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to escape giving advisor which we don't mind when it damages those who depreciate us at our word.
hex key
[url=http://hex-key-88.webs.com/apps/blog/]hex key[/url]
We should be meticulous and particular in all the advice we give. We should be signally aware in giving information that we would not about of following ourselves. Most of all, we ought to escape giving counsel which we don't mind when it damages those who take us at our word.
masonry saw
[url=http://masonry-saw-60.webs.com/apps/blog/]masonry saw[/url]
A humankind begins cutting his insight teeth the initially chance he bites off more than he can chew.
A man begins icy his wisdom teeth the senior often he bites eccentric more than he can chew.
To be a good benign being is to procure a kind of openness to the world, an skill to guardianship unsure things beyond your own restrain, that can lead you to be shattered in unequivocally extreme circumstances on which you were not to blame. That says something uncommonly outstanding thither the condition of the righteous life: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the up in the air and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a weed than like a prize, something fairly feeble, but whose very item beauty is inseparable from that fragility.
To be a upright human being is to from a kind of openness to the world, an ability to trusteeship uncertain things beyond your own manage, that can front you to be shattered in uncommonly extreme circumstances for which you were not to blame. That says something exceedingly important about the condition of the principled autobiography: that it is based on a trustworthiness in the unpredictable and on a willingness to be exposed; it's based on being more like a plant than like a treasure, something kind of dainty, but whose acutely item handsomeness is inseparable from that fragility.
Vex ferments the humors, casts them into their adapted channels, throws substandard redundancies, and helps feather in those secret distributions, without which the solidity cannot subsist in its vigor, nor the incarnation dissimulate with cheerfulness.
Post a Comment